Monday, March 26, 2012

Assessment Plan- The Alphabet




Assessment Plan: The Alphabet

Katherine Torres

EDU645

Professor Kyger

March 26, 2012





























Assessment Plan: The Alphabet

Assessment Title: Recognize, Write and Identify Placement of Letters of the Alphabet

Subject Area: Language Arts/Reading/Concepts of Print

Grade Level: Kindergarten

Purpose of Assessment Plan:

The purpose of this assessment plan is to determine if the student has acquired the knowledge and skills required to recognize and write upper and lower case letters of the alphabet and identify placement of upper and lower case letters of the alphabet with accuracy.     

Learning Outcomes:

  1. The student will recognize printed letters of the alphabet with 100% accuracy.
  2.  The student will write the letters of the alphabet, upper and lower case, with 100% accuracy.
  3. The student will identify placement of upper and lower case letters of the alphabet, i.e. at the beginning of their name with 80% accuracy.

Assessment Context:

In the first section of the assessment, the student will be asked to recognize and circle the letters.  The student will be provided with a worksheet with the letters of the alphabet.  The teacher will read a letter and ask the student to circle the required letter of the alphabet on the paper; an example will be provided for the student to ensure that the student understands the directions.

Example: Circle the letter A:                         

  1. A                                                                          
  2. B                                                       
  3. C

In the second section of the assessment, the worksheet will have upper case letters on the left side and lower case letters on the right side of the page.  The students will be asked to draw a line to match upper and lower case letters. 

Example: Match upper case letters to lower case letters:

A                                           b

C                                           a

B                                           c

The third section of the assessment will ask the student to properly place upper and lower case letters.  The student will be asked to write their first name and the teacher will check that the student has written their name with a capital letter at the beginning of their name.

Example: The teacher will give oral directions to the student.  Write your first name and place an upper case letter at the beginning, every time you write your first name.

Testing Constraints:

The students will be encouraged to engage prior knowledge before the assessment, by reviewing the letters of the alphabet.  The letters of the alphabet and the sounds each letter makes will be reviewed by singing the alphabet song and then asking the students to identify words starting with each letter of the alphabet, i.e. have students raise their hands and indicate what letter apple begins with.  Because young children respond well to oral questions and concrete tasks, the students will require doing little reading or writing in the assessment; instead, they will be asked to circle and draw lines to correct responses.  The assessment will be one page long and a maximum of 20 to 30 minutes will be given to the students to complete the assessment.  Students will also be allowed to ask the teacher for assistance if required.   



Holistic Rubric:

CATEGORY
ADVANCED- 4
PROFICIENT- 3
ADEQUATE- 2
LIMITED- 1
LETTER RECOGNITION
Student circles the right letter of the alphabet always.
Student circles the right letter of the alphabet most of the time.
Student circles the right letter of the alphabet some of the time.
The student does not circle the right letter of the alphabet.
UPPER CASE LETTER RECOGNITION
Student is able to identify upper case letters of the alphabet.
Student identifies most upper case letters of the alphabet.
Student identifies some upper case letters of the alphabet.
Student is not able to recognize upper case letters of the alphabet.
LOWER CASE LETTER RECOGNITION
Student is able to identify lower case letter of the alphabet.
Student identifies most lower case letters of the alphabet.
Student identifies some lower case letters of the alphabet.
Student is not able to recognize lower case letters of the alphabet.
USES AN UPPER CASE LETTER AT THE BEGINNING OF THE NAME
Student always writes his/her name beginning with an upper case letter.
Student most of the time, writes his/her name beginning with an upper case letter.
Student some of the time, writes his/her name beginning with an upper case letter.
Student never writes an upper case letter at the beginning of his her/name.



Kubiszyn and Borich (2010) state that an instructional objective “should be a clear and concise statement of the skill or skills that the students will be expected to perform after a unit of instruction” (p. 110).  Thus, a learning outcome should include an action verb that specifies the knowledge or skills that will be acquired, conditions that are required for the learning to take place and a performance level that is considered appropriate to demonstrate student mastery.  The assessment above includes the necessary learning outcomes that will support the purpose.  These three learning outcomes will have the student recognize the letters of the alphabet, write upper and lower case letters of the alphabet and identify when it is necessary to place an upper case letter, i.e. at the beginning of their name.  Therefore, the end result implies that a learning outcome is the final product.

The Alphabet assessment plan has observable learning outcomes and the assessment context clearly identifies tasks or situations in which learners will be able to demonstrate the knowledge gained.  The context for this assessment has been designed carefully and with age-appropriate skills in mind.  According to Wortham (2010), it is important to determine the appropriate amount of test items or tasks that will be included in the test.  Wortham also states that “a balance is reached between the number of items needed to demonstrate the child’s responses to determine understanding and a reasonable length that will not overtax the child’s ability to attend to the task” (p. 195).  Education experts suggest that for primary grades, the length of the assessment should not be longer that the time that is usually needed to complete classroom activities.  The Alphabet assessment should not take the student more than the required 20 to 30 minutes, because it is only one page long.

The Alphabet assessment clearly describes the learning that will take place and the learning outcomes are simple and straightforward.  The directions are also clear and unambiguous and include an accurate description of the instructional intent.  According to Naz (2009), a performance assessment should include the four require components of assessment: performance, product, condition and criterion.  The performance component specifies the actions observed as a result of instruction.  The Alphabet assessment clearly states that the student will be assessed on their ability to recognize and write upper and lower case letters of the alphabet with 100% accuracy, as well as identify placement of upper and lower case letters of the alphabet with 80% accuracy.  The product is what the student will produce; in this case, the student will circle the correct letter, match the upper case to the correct lower case and write their name with an upper case letter at the beginning, followed by lower case letters.  The worksheet given to the student is the condition and the holistic rubric will measures student performance.

Kubiszyn and Borich state that it is important to keep in mind all of the factors that may influence testing conditions.  Testing constraints refer to the conditions impose on the learners during test.  Some of the constraints which may influence testing conditions are time, reference material, other people, equipment, prior knowledge of the task and scoring criteria.  Teachers usually decide which constraints will be imposed on a performance assessment.  The Alphabet assessment will encourage students to engage prior knowledge, in order to build new knowledge.  This will be accomplished by reviewing the alphabet with the students before the assessment.  Each letter and the sound they make will be reviewed by the teacher, as well as having students identifying words starting with each letter of the alphabet.  The students will be given the worksheets and the instructions will be explained; the teacher will be available for questions and no other equipment will be required.  The student will not be informed of the scoring criteria.

Wortham tells us that it is important to keep the test well-balanced; the number of items on the test should be at a reasonable length.  For children in primary grades, according to Wortham, the test should not exceed the time that is usually needed to complete regular classroom assignments; the maximum should be between 20 to 30 minutes and is considered reasonable in testing students at this grade level.  The recommended length to evaluate students at this stage is commonly one page long.  The Alphabet test is designed to take the recommended time and there will be only one worksheet for the students to complete.  This assessment is designed to allow the teacher to assess if the students are learning the information.  The items on the Alphabet assessment provide different types of practice for the students and show if the students are making adequate progress; the teacher will have enough information to monitor student learning and mastery of objectives.



According to Kubiszyn and Borich, one of the greatest limitations of performance assessments is the time that is required to score them.  However, it is important for teachers to dedicate enough time and effort to score them.  Kubiszyn and Borich state that “your goal when scoring performance tests is to do justice to the time spent developing them and the effort expended by students taking them.  You can accomplish this by developing a carefully constructed scoring system…rubrics” (p. 195).  A holistic scoring estimates the overall quality of the performance and assigns a numerical value assigning points for a specific performance.  These rubrics will usually have competency labels that define the level of performance; the student’s work is assessed using the descriptors under each level of competence.  Holistic rubrics are usually used when an overall judgment is made about the performance. 

Although there are many advantages to using holistic rubrics, many experts believe that they may lack validity and reliability.  This could be avoided by designing rubrics that focus on the quality of the work and the appropriate characteristics of student work.  The holistic rubric designed to assess performance on the Alphabet assessment, focuses on specific performance by the student.  This rubric is divided into four levels of performance: Advanced, Proficient, Adequate and Limited.  Students will be evaluated on letter recognition, upper case letter recognition, lower case letter recognition and proper placement of upper case letter at the beginning of their first name.  This rubric can also be used to compare student performance on previous or future attempts.  Thus, the construction of this specific holistic rubric will be effective in measuring student performance at different levels of performance.  The Alphabet assessment has been effectively designed to promote learning and to assess if students have gained the knowledge and skills required by this specific performance assessment.              


References


Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G. (2010). Educational testing & measurement: Classroom application and practice (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.

Naz, B.A. (2009). Presentation on instructional objectives. Retrieved from ERIC library database. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED505999.pdf

Rubistar. (2000-2008). Create Rubrics for your Project-Based Learning Activities. ALTEC at University of Kansas. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=Tutorial&module=Rubistar

Wortham, S.C. (2008). Assessment In Early Childhood Education. (5th edition) Upper Saddle River: New Jersey.






No comments:

Post a Comment