Monday, March 26, 2012

Assessment Plan- The Alphabet




Assessment Plan: The Alphabet

Katherine Torres

EDU645

Professor Kyger

March 26, 2012





























Assessment Plan: The Alphabet

Assessment Title: Recognize, Write and Identify Placement of Letters of the Alphabet

Subject Area: Language Arts/Reading/Concepts of Print

Grade Level: Kindergarten

Purpose of Assessment Plan:

The purpose of this assessment plan is to determine if the student has acquired the knowledge and skills required to recognize and write upper and lower case letters of the alphabet and identify placement of upper and lower case letters of the alphabet with accuracy.     

Learning Outcomes:

  1. The student will recognize printed letters of the alphabet with 100% accuracy.
  2.  The student will write the letters of the alphabet, upper and lower case, with 100% accuracy.
  3. The student will identify placement of upper and lower case letters of the alphabet, i.e. at the beginning of their name with 80% accuracy.

Assessment Context:

In the first section of the assessment, the student will be asked to recognize and circle the letters.  The student will be provided with a worksheet with the letters of the alphabet.  The teacher will read a letter and ask the student to circle the required letter of the alphabet on the paper; an example will be provided for the student to ensure that the student understands the directions.

Example: Circle the letter A:                         

  1. A                                                                          
  2. B                                                       
  3. C

In the second section of the assessment, the worksheet will have upper case letters on the left side and lower case letters on the right side of the page.  The students will be asked to draw a line to match upper and lower case letters. 

Example: Match upper case letters to lower case letters:

A                                           b

C                                           a

B                                           c

The third section of the assessment will ask the student to properly place upper and lower case letters.  The student will be asked to write their first name and the teacher will check that the student has written their name with a capital letter at the beginning of their name.

Example: The teacher will give oral directions to the student.  Write your first name and place an upper case letter at the beginning, every time you write your first name.

Testing Constraints:

The students will be encouraged to engage prior knowledge before the assessment, by reviewing the letters of the alphabet.  The letters of the alphabet and the sounds each letter makes will be reviewed by singing the alphabet song and then asking the students to identify words starting with each letter of the alphabet, i.e. have students raise their hands and indicate what letter apple begins with.  Because young children respond well to oral questions and concrete tasks, the students will require doing little reading or writing in the assessment; instead, they will be asked to circle and draw lines to correct responses.  The assessment will be one page long and a maximum of 20 to 30 minutes will be given to the students to complete the assessment.  Students will also be allowed to ask the teacher for assistance if required.   



Holistic Rubric:

CATEGORY
ADVANCED- 4
PROFICIENT- 3
ADEQUATE- 2
LIMITED- 1
LETTER RECOGNITION
Student circles the right letter of the alphabet always.
Student circles the right letter of the alphabet most of the time.
Student circles the right letter of the alphabet some of the time.
The student does not circle the right letter of the alphabet.
UPPER CASE LETTER RECOGNITION
Student is able to identify upper case letters of the alphabet.
Student identifies most upper case letters of the alphabet.
Student identifies some upper case letters of the alphabet.
Student is not able to recognize upper case letters of the alphabet.
LOWER CASE LETTER RECOGNITION
Student is able to identify lower case letter of the alphabet.
Student identifies most lower case letters of the alphabet.
Student identifies some lower case letters of the alphabet.
Student is not able to recognize lower case letters of the alphabet.
USES AN UPPER CASE LETTER AT THE BEGINNING OF THE NAME
Student always writes his/her name beginning with an upper case letter.
Student most of the time, writes his/her name beginning with an upper case letter.
Student some of the time, writes his/her name beginning with an upper case letter.
Student never writes an upper case letter at the beginning of his her/name.



Kubiszyn and Borich (2010) state that an instructional objective “should be a clear and concise statement of the skill or skills that the students will be expected to perform after a unit of instruction” (p. 110).  Thus, a learning outcome should include an action verb that specifies the knowledge or skills that will be acquired, conditions that are required for the learning to take place and a performance level that is considered appropriate to demonstrate student mastery.  The assessment above includes the necessary learning outcomes that will support the purpose.  These three learning outcomes will have the student recognize the letters of the alphabet, write upper and lower case letters of the alphabet and identify when it is necessary to place an upper case letter, i.e. at the beginning of their name.  Therefore, the end result implies that a learning outcome is the final product.

The Alphabet assessment plan has observable learning outcomes and the assessment context clearly identifies tasks or situations in which learners will be able to demonstrate the knowledge gained.  The context for this assessment has been designed carefully and with age-appropriate skills in mind.  According to Wortham (2010), it is important to determine the appropriate amount of test items or tasks that will be included in the test.  Wortham also states that “a balance is reached between the number of items needed to demonstrate the child’s responses to determine understanding and a reasonable length that will not overtax the child’s ability to attend to the task” (p. 195).  Education experts suggest that for primary grades, the length of the assessment should not be longer that the time that is usually needed to complete classroom activities.  The Alphabet assessment should not take the student more than the required 20 to 30 minutes, because it is only one page long.

The Alphabet assessment clearly describes the learning that will take place and the learning outcomes are simple and straightforward.  The directions are also clear and unambiguous and include an accurate description of the instructional intent.  According to Naz (2009), a performance assessment should include the four require components of assessment: performance, product, condition and criterion.  The performance component specifies the actions observed as a result of instruction.  The Alphabet assessment clearly states that the student will be assessed on their ability to recognize and write upper and lower case letters of the alphabet with 100% accuracy, as well as identify placement of upper and lower case letters of the alphabet with 80% accuracy.  The product is what the student will produce; in this case, the student will circle the correct letter, match the upper case to the correct lower case and write their name with an upper case letter at the beginning, followed by lower case letters.  The worksheet given to the student is the condition and the holistic rubric will measures student performance.

Kubiszyn and Borich state that it is important to keep in mind all of the factors that may influence testing conditions.  Testing constraints refer to the conditions impose on the learners during test.  Some of the constraints which may influence testing conditions are time, reference material, other people, equipment, prior knowledge of the task and scoring criteria.  Teachers usually decide which constraints will be imposed on a performance assessment.  The Alphabet assessment will encourage students to engage prior knowledge, in order to build new knowledge.  This will be accomplished by reviewing the alphabet with the students before the assessment.  Each letter and the sound they make will be reviewed by the teacher, as well as having students identifying words starting with each letter of the alphabet.  The students will be given the worksheets and the instructions will be explained; the teacher will be available for questions and no other equipment will be required.  The student will not be informed of the scoring criteria.

Wortham tells us that it is important to keep the test well-balanced; the number of items on the test should be at a reasonable length.  For children in primary grades, according to Wortham, the test should not exceed the time that is usually needed to complete regular classroom assignments; the maximum should be between 20 to 30 minutes and is considered reasonable in testing students at this grade level.  The recommended length to evaluate students at this stage is commonly one page long.  The Alphabet test is designed to take the recommended time and there will be only one worksheet for the students to complete.  This assessment is designed to allow the teacher to assess if the students are learning the information.  The items on the Alphabet assessment provide different types of practice for the students and show if the students are making adequate progress; the teacher will have enough information to monitor student learning and mastery of objectives.



According to Kubiszyn and Borich, one of the greatest limitations of performance assessments is the time that is required to score them.  However, it is important for teachers to dedicate enough time and effort to score them.  Kubiszyn and Borich state that “your goal when scoring performance tests is to do justice to the time spent developing them and the effort expended by students taking them.  You can accomplish this by developing a carefully constructed scoring system…rubrics” (p. 195).  A holistic scoring estimates the overall quality of the performance and assigns a numerical value assigning points for a specific performance.  These rubrics will usually have competency labels that define the level of performance; the student’s work is assessed using the descriptors under each level of competence.  Holistic rubrics are usually used when an overall judgment is made about the performance. 

Although there are many advantages to using holistic rubrics, many experts believe that they may lack validity and reliability.  This could be avoided by designing rubrics that focus on the quality of the work and the appropriate characteristics of student work.  The holistic rubric designed to assess performance on the Alphabet assessment, focuses on specific performance by the student.  This rubric is divided into four levels of performance: Advanced, Proficient, Adequate and Limited.  Students will be evaluated on letter recognition, upper case letter recognition, lower case letter recognition and proper placement of upper case letter at the beginning of their first name.  This rubric can also be used to compare student performance on previous or future attempts.  Thus, the construction of this specific holistic rubric will be effective in measuring student performance at different levels of performance.  The Alphabet assessment has been effectively designed to promote learning and to assess if students have gained the knowledge and skills required by this specific performance assessment.              


References


Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G. (2010). Educational testing & measurement: Classroom application and practice (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.

Naz, B.A. (2009). Presentation on instructional objectives. Retrieved from ERIC library database. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED505999.pdf

Rubistar. (2000-2008). Create Rubrics for your Project-Based Learning Activities. ALTEC at University of Kansas. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=Tutorial&module=Rubistar

Wortham, S.C. (2008). Assessment In Early Childhood Education. (5th edition) Upper Saddle River: New Jersey.






Monday, March 5, 2012

Test and Essay Items


Learning Outcomes: Test and Essay Items

Classroom tests should be closely matched to curriculum objectives and content.  Teachers have the option to either design the test themselves or obtain it from a textbook or other commercial source.  Regardless of how the teacher designs the test or where the test is obtained, its main purpose is to be used to measure the student’s ability to benefit from instruction.  According to Wortham (2008), classroom tests measure student accomplishment and learning needs in relation to specific classroom objectives.  Wortham also state that classroom tests “can be used for placement diagnosis, formative testing and summative testing” (p. 186).  Thus, it is essential to initially determine the purpose of the test and then decide on a test design which will support specific learning outcomes.

 Wortham suggests following the following steps based on Bloom’s model of mastery of learning, in order to design a test to measure student learning accurately.  This process includes the following steps: determining instructional objectives, constructing a table of specifications, designing formative and summative evaluations, designing learning experiences, and designing correctives and enrichment activities.  Once the teacher has decided on the test design, the teacher should develop the items that describe the objectives to be tested.  One the format has been determined, the teacher should decide on the amount of test items that should be included in the test.  Lastly, the teacher needs to assemble the test items into a form that will enable the teacher to assess how well the student is learning the information.  An additional method of assessing how well the student is learning the information is by designing essay items.  Kubiszyn and Borich (2010) state that essay items requires the student to organize, integrate, and synthesize knowledge, using more than recall information presented in the lesson unit.  Essay items aim to assess the student’s complex cognitive skills.

Test and Essay Items: Unit on Coins

Unit Title: Test on Coins

Subject: Math

Grade level: First Grade

Materials: Test form clearly designed to have students identify coins (quarter, dime, nickel, and penny), pencil.

Introduction: This test will assess students on the unit of coins.  Students will identify each coin by sight and identify the value of each coin.  The student will also be expected to know where to place the cent (¢) sign.  The teacher will give each student a printed paper with the instructions written on them and with the pictures of the coins.  On the paper there will be four boxes; on each box there will be a picture of a coin (quarter, dime, nickel and penny).  There will be a blank line underneath each picture and the student will be asked to write the value of the coin with the cent (¢) sign in the proper place.   Next, there will be four coins pictured again, but this time they will be printed from top to bottom with a word bank with the names of the coins next to them; the student will be asked to draw a line and match the coin to its name.  For the last part of the test the student will be asked to draw the coins themselves, write the value inside their drawing of the coin and write out the name underneath each coin.  An example will be provided for each of the three test items. 

Test items and learning outcomes:

  1. Identify the coin and write value of coin.
  2. Match each picture of a coin, to its printed name correctly.
  3. Draw each coin, identify value and print name of coin correctly.



Essay Item:

Have the student write out a sentence explaining the thought process involved when they were asked to complete the last test item.  Student will employ information learned throughout the unit on coins and will be able to demonstrate their mastery of these specific skills and which support these specific learning outcomes.  Student will be graded on their ability to organize, integrate and synthesize knowledge and their use of complex cognitive skills.  This essay will demonstrate each child’s unique method of applying prior knowledge and will also demonstrate how students construct new knowledge.






























References

Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G. (2010). Educational testing & measurement: Classroom application and practice (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.

Wortham, S.C. (2008). Assessment In Early Childhood Education. (5th edition) Upper Saddle River: New Jersey.








Friday, February 24, 2012

Lesson Plan: Unit on Coins


Learning Outcomes

According to Naz (2009), learning is the acquisition of knowledge acquired by students after being exposed to specific changes and experiences in the classroom; student learning is the purpose of instruction.  These changes are usually specified in instructional objectives designed by an educator.  An objective is defined as “a clear and unambiguous description of an instructional intent” (p. 2).  Therefore, an objective is a statement of what a student should obtain from a lesson.  Naz states that a well-stated objective will include four components: performance, product, condition and criterion.  The performance component specifies the student actions that will be observed as a result of instruction; the product is what the students will produce by their action; the condition includes the materials that will be available to students and the criterion refers to the level of acceptable student performance.

Kubiszyn and Borich (2010) state that “an instructional objective describes any special conditions in which the learning will take place” (p. 112).  Observable learning outcomes should specify the place, time, materials and resources, among other conditions, and it must be stated clearly in the objective.  An instructional objective will also indicate how well the task is being performed by the student.  Thus, an effective instructional objective will include observable learning outcomes, conditions and a criterion level.  Kubiszyn and Borich suggest that in instructional objectives, the learning outcomes and conditions specified in the assessment, must match the learning outcome and conditions described in the objective.  The ultimate goal, according to Kubiszyn and Borich, is to measure achievement by asking students to demonstrate mastery of skills under conditions strictly specified in the instructional objective.







Lesson Plan: Unit on Coins



Unit Title: Coins

Subject: Math

Grade Level: First Grade

Materials: Paper with pictures of coins clearly drawn (quarter, dime, nickel and penny), pencil.

Introduction: This lesson plan will focus on the unit of coins.  Students will be exposed to four coins: quarter, dime, nickel and penny.  Students will be taught how to identify each coin; they will be taught how to spell the name of each coin and they will also be taught the number value for each coin.  The students will be taught the use of the cent sign (¢) and they will also be taught how to match each coin to its number value.  The instructor will give each student a printed paper with the instructions, which will ask the students to draw a line to match the coins with their names.  There will be four coins with their names written underneath each coin.  The coins will be pictured again on the paper, but this time, there will be four blank lines underneath each coin; the student will write in the number value underneath each coin.  An example will be provided for each one of these activities to ensure that the student understands what the learning outcomes will be.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. The student will be able to identify four coins: quarter, dime, nickel and penny by sight with 100% accuracy.
  2. The student will be able to match four coins with their letter names with 100% accuracy.
  3. The student will be able to match the four coins to their number value by using a cent sign (¢) with 100% accuracy.


References


Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G. (2010). Educational testing & measurement: Classroom application and practice (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.

Naz, B.A. (2009). Presentation on instructional objectives. Retrieved from ERIC library database. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED505999.pdf